crimescenescript

media type="custom" key="4738239" My name is Detective Adamo. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene It was taken place in felix Navidad two bedroom one bathroom apartment. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad. (Background on Felix?) The suspect guilty of committing this crime is kendra Goode. (Motive?) This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was to me i belive that she lied about going to take a shower when alfredo was going to the bathroom (How do you know Alfredo wasn't lying? What was the time frame in their stories to support your findings?). The next piece of evidence isthe poision that she put in his cup that killed him (How do you know? What test did you perform? What were the results?). This connects the suspect to the crime because as i said she lied about taking a shower. (This is what the cup test told you?) Another piece of evidence collected wasthe fingerprints on the cup. It was found were the body was found.The results of the test were shown that she had killed him. (How do you kill someone with a fingerprint?) The last piece of evidence collected was the note that she had written. . This connects the suspect to the crime because she was trying to frame veras and as we. (What did the note say? How do you know Kendra was trying to frame Vera?) According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. (Describe the series of events from the very beginning to the end )Felix would give all four of the money if he deid (How can you give someone money if you're dead?) so it was in the middle of the day and alfredo gave him a drink and then kendra came down and then put the poisoin inthe ice cube before they froze and then he drank and that was his death. Therefore,kendra Goode committed the crime.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 53% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.__**  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__ Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  __** || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information__**  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || **__Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.__**  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || **__Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.__**  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || **__Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || **__ Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  __** || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  || Volume is acceptable.  || **__Volume is occasionally inconsistent.__**  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 30/57